Search Criteria

 






Key Word Search by:









Organization Type


State or Jurisdiction


Congressional District





help

Division or Office
help

Grants to:


Date Range Start


Date Range End


  • Special Searches




    Product Type


    Media Coverage Type








 


Search Results

Grant number like: FA-50491-04

Permalink for this Search

1
Page size:
 1 items in 1 pages
Award Number Grant ProgramAward RecipientProject TitleAward PeriodApproved Award Total
1
Page size:
 1 items in 1 pages
FA-50491-04Research Programs: Fellowships for University TeachersSusan M. ShellKant's "True Politics": Democratic Honor and the Liberal State7/1/2005 - 12/31/2006$40,000.00SusanM.Shell   Boston CollegeChestnut HillMA02467-3800USA2003Political Science, GeneralFellowships for University TeachersResearch Programs400000400000

The book-length study I am proposing grows out of a conviction that Kant has more to say to current students of politics, including many who deem themselves 'realists,' than is generally supposed. The first chapter will critically consider three influential misreadings of Kant's thought, associated with the work of John Rawls, Jürgen Habermas and Michel Foucault respectively. The remainder of the study will be devoted to a positive analysis of what Kant calls, in a famous and ringing passage of Perpetual Peace, the 'true politics.' Chapter Two will take up Kant's extraordinarily rich, and largely ignored, considerations of the political uses of the human desire for 'regard' or 'honor.' Chapter Three consider the intimate, if disquieting, relation between the essence of liberal democratic statehood and authority to punish, a relation that bears especially on the peculiar 'honor' of citizens. Chapter Four addresses itself directly to the question of the nature of liberal-democratic citizenship. Kant's surprisingly 'organic' treatment of the state is, as I will argue, helpful, though not altogether successful, in teasing out the requirements and tensions inherent in the liberal-democratic way of life. Chapter Five concerns itself with the 'misuse' of Kantian argument on behalf of an 'internationalism' he would have regarded as at best simplistic and at worst potentially fatal. Kant's nuanced consideration of the appropriate institutional means for promoting peace, and the force of arms on which they ultimately depend, can serve, as I will argue, as a useful antidote to both overweening hopefulness in international affairs and a self-fulfilling, and hence equally imprudent despair.