Search Criteria

 






Key Word Search by:









Organization Type


State or Jurisdiction


Congressional District





help

Division or Office
help

Grants to:


Date Range Start


Date Range End


  • Special Searches




    Product Type


    Media Coverage Type








 


Search Results

Grant number like: FB-52686-06

Permalink for this Search

1
Page size:
 1 items in 1 pages
Award Number Grant ProgramAward RecipientProject TitleAward PeriodApproved Award Total
1
Page size:
 1 items in 1 pages
FB-52686-06Research Programs: Fellowships for College Teachers and Independent ScholarsJ. Douglas SmithAn Unfinished Revolution: Reapportionment and the Quest for Democracy in 20th-Century America9/1/2006 - 8/31/2007$40,000.00J.DouglasSmith   Unaffiliated Independent ScholarLos AngelesCA90068-2726USA2005U.S. HistoryFellowships for College Teachers and Independent ScholarsResearch Programs400000400000

When asked the most important issue decided by his Court, Chief Justice Earl Warren cited Baker v. Carr (1962), Reynolds v. Sims (1964), and a series of companion cases that established the principle of “one-person, one-vote” in all congressional and state legislative apportionments. Despite the importance of these cases, not one full-length monograph has appeared in print in nearly thirty-five years. During that time, numerous relevant sources have become available. Envisioned as a sweeping political and social history, this study will examine not only why the reapportionment decisions mattered as much as Warren claimed, but also how, ironically, the decisions came to matter in ways that Warren never anticipated.