Program

Research Programs: Fellowships for University Teachers

Period of Performance

9/1/2015 - 8/31/2016

Funding Totals

$50,400.00 (approved)
$50,400.00 (awarded)


Common Law Reasoning

FAIN: FA-58287-15

John F. Horty
University of Maryland, College Park (College Park, MD 20742-5141)

The aim of this project is to develop a new theory of common law reasoning. Special attention is focused on the doctrine of precedent, according to which the decisions of earlier courts constrain the decisions of later courts, while still allowing these later courts a degree of freedom. It is often thought that the constraints of precedent are carried through rules. In recent work, however, I have developed a new model according to which precedential constraint is a matter of reasons, rather than rules. The development of the law is thus pictured, not as the elaboration of an increasingly complex system of rules, but as the gradual construction a priority ordering on reasons. Later courts are constrained to respect the priorities established by earlier courts, but can strengthen the ordering with new decisions of their own. I propose to expand this line of research, and to assemble the resulting material into a book.





Associated Products

Constraint and Freedom in the Common Law (Article)
Title: Constraint and Freedom in the Common Law
Author: John Horty
Abstract: na
Year: 2015
Format: Journal
Periodical Title: Philosophers' Imprint, vol. 15, no. 5 (2015)

Reasoning with Precedent as Constrained Natural Reasoning (Book Section)
Title: Reasoning with Precedent as Constrained Natural Reasoning
Author: John Horty
Editor: Errol Lord
Editor: Barry Maguire
Abstract: na
Year: 2016
Publisher: New York: Oxford University Press
Book Title: Weighing Reasons, pp.193-212

Reasoning with Dimensions and Magnitudes (Book Section)
Title: Reasoning with Dimensions and Magnitudes
Author: John Horty
Abstract: na
Year: 2017
Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery Press
Book Title: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Artifical Intelligence and Law