Program

Digital Humanities: Fellowships Open Book Program

Period of Performance

9/1/2020 - 2/28/2022

Funding Totals

$5,500.00 (approved)
$5,500.00 (awarded)


Open Access Edition of Imagination and Science in Romanticism by Richard C. Sha

FAIN: DR-272592-20

Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD 21218-2608)
Claire Tamberino (Project Director: March 2020 to December 2022)

This project will publish the book Imagination and Science in Romanticism, written by NEH Fellow Richard C. Sha (NEH grant number FA-56408-12), in an electronic open access format under a Creative Commons license, making it available for free download and distribution. The author will be paid a royalty of at least $500 upon release of the open access edition.





Associated Products

Single Publication (Open Access eBook or Collection)
Publication Type: Single Publication
Title: Imagination and Science in Romanticism
Year: 2021
ISBN: 9781421441245
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Author: Richard C. Sha
Abstract: Richard C. Sha argues that scientific understandings of the imagination indelibly shaped literary Romanticism. Challenging the idea that the imagination found a home only on the side of the literary, as a mental vehicle for transcending the worldly materials of the sciences, Sha shows how imagination helped to operationalize both scientific and literary discovery. Essentially, the imagination forced writers to consider the difference between what was possible and impossible while thinking about how that difference could be known. Sha examines how the imagination functioned within physics and chemistry in Percy Bysshe Shelley's Prometheus Unbound, neurology in Blake's Vala, or The Four Zoas, physiology in Coleridge's Biographia Literaria, and obstetrics and embryology in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. He also demonstrates how the imagination was called upon to do aesthetic and scientific work using primary examples taken from the work of scientists and philosophers Davy, Dalton, Faraday, Priestley, Kant, Mary Somerville, Oersted, Marcet, Smellie, Swedenborg, Blumenbach, Buffon, Erasmus Darwin, and Von Baer, among others. Sha concludes that both fields benefited from thinking about how imagination could cooperate with reason—but that this partnership was impossible unless imagination's penchant for fantasy could be contained.
Primary URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/59664
Primary URL Description: Project MUSE
Secondary URL: https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/11451/imagination-and-science-romanticism
Secondary URL Description: Hopkins Press
Type: Single author monograph